School of the Americas 2012

This past weekend may have seemed stereotypical to those who know me, but I was reflecting a little bit more than usual. In 2009 & 2010, I had the absolute once-in-a-lifetime chance to go the Ignatian Family Teach-In and the School of the Americas (SOA) Vigil. Sadly this year, marks the second time I have been unable to make it to George. But for those able to make it, this weekend marks the 22nd time that people gathered outside the gates of Ft. Benning, Georgia to bring to light the actions of the SOA.

The following is an e-mail sent out from the School of the Americas Watch (SOAW) on this weekend. If you would like additional information on the SOA and the watch group, please check out the SOAW website.

THOUSANDS GATHERED AT THE GATES OF U.S. MILITARY BASE IN GEORGIA TO CLOSE THE SOA/WHINSEC

3-DAY MOBILIZATION CULMINATES WITH MASS DIE-IN AND FUNERAL PROCESSION TO COMMEMORATE THE VICTIMS OF SOA/ WHINSEC VIOLENCE AND U.S. MILITARIZATION

NASHUA CHANTAL, 60 OF AMERICUS, GEORGIA CROSSES OVER THE FENCE TO CARRY THE PROTEST ONTO THE MILITARY BASE, FACES SIX MONTHS IN FEDERAL PRISON

Columbus, Georgia - The largest annual anti-militarization gathering in North America took place in Columbus, Georgia, from November 16-18, 2012.

Nashua Chantal of Americus, Georgia, who stood in silence with the message 'Study war no more' painted across his face during the symbolic funeral march, crossed the line onto the military base. The base is home to the US Army School of the Americas, renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (SOA/WHINSEC) in 2001, a training facility that has turned out some of Latin America's most notorious killers and continues to be implicated in human rights abuses today. Nashua Chantal was arrested after he crossed over the barb-wired, and is currently in the custody of the military police. He will be arraigned in federal court and is facing up to six months in federal prison for his courageous act of civil disobedience.

The weekend included a massive rally on Saturday, where thousands came together at the gates of the School of the Americas (SOA/ WHINSEC), now named the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, and culminated on Sunday, November 18 with a mass die-in and funeral procession to commemorate the victims of SOA/ WHINSEC violence and U.S. militarization.

The weekend featured musicians like emma's revolution and Rebel Diaz, and international speakers like Francia Marquez from Colombia, Martin Almada from Paraguay, and Ismael Moreno from Honduras.

Francia Marquez, a leader from the Afro-Colombian gold-mining community of La Toma in southwestern Colombia, talked about how her community has struggled against political, economic and armed forces looking to control their hands and resources.

Martin Almada, a Paraguayan educator, talked about his experience as a political prisoner under the regime of Alfredo Stroessner. His wife died of a heart attack after being forced to hear through a telephone her husband's cries as he was tortured.

Ismael Moreno (known in Honduras as Father Melo), a Jesuit priest, radio host and contributor to Envio magazine, had his radio station occupied by the military following the SOA led military coup and he began receiving death threats.

Moreno's story shows how, even though the school changed its name in 2001 to WHINSEC, the graduates of this U.S. taxpayer-funded military school are still key players in human rights abuses throughout Latin America. 

Last week, on November 14, an SOA Watch delegation met with Denis McDonough, the National Deputy Security Advisor to President Obama in the White House, to ask that the SOA/WHINSEC be shut down by Executive Order. In January, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) will introduced legislation to suspend operations at the school and investigate human rights abuses in Latin America.

The SOA/WHINSEC is a U.S. taxpayer-funded military training school for Latin American soldiers, located at Fort Benning, Georgia. The school made headlines in 1996 when the Pentagon released training manuals used at the school that advocated torture, extortion and execution. Despite this, no independent investigation into the training facility has ever taken place. 

SOA Watch is a nonviolent grassroots movement that works to close the School of the Americas and change U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America. For more information, visit www.SOAW.org.

DMN Sounding Off Quote

For several months now I have attempted to answer the Sounding Off question for the NeighborsGo section of the Dallas Morning News. Below is this week's question and my answer. 

Question:
Some school districts, including Dallas ISD, have increased the number of magnet campuses, preparatory academies and special programs in recent years. What is your opinion on this trend? Should more schools consider these programs, or is a “traditional” school format the way to go?

Answer: For many students, the traditional public school structure works well and graduates of many DISD schools are able to become functioning members of society and in many cases successful individuals.

On the other hand, there are a portion of students that traditional school structure does not fit them best. It is for these students that magnet, prepartory academies and special programs need to exist. I work with students from the local magnet programs and I am continully impressed by their knowledge and ability to use their education.  

One day without shoes

This is the first year in several that I will not be able to fully participate in One Day Without Shoes, an international day in order to try to understand what millions of children encounter daily - a life without shoes.

Started by TOMS, a footwear and eyewear movement, people are asked to live their normal day, but without shoes. Not only is the day completely humbling, but for me it helps to put my life in perspective.

Imagine going through life without shoes - no matter where you are, there is dirt, rocks and not always the soft reprieve of grass, just imagine encountering all that without shoes. Each year I am able to challenge myself a little further and enjoy the day from a different perspective.

My first One Day Without Shoes I was on Spring Hill's campus. By that point in my college career I was vary familiar with the campus and knew what places what to avoid when I adventured barefoot. My lesson for that year was not only the pain that came through my body via my feet, but how many people who do not have shoes find themselves having to take circuitous routes in order to not injure themselves or worse become ill from the exposure their feet have endured.

My second time I was living in Austin, although familiar with the route I took to work - I decided to further challenge myself and only take public transportation that day. My roommate Pamela joined me for my second half of my day - where we walked from my work to the University of Texas to the Texas State Capitol and then took the city bus home.

Let's just say I know the secrets to crossing busy streets without shoes, I know that grass no matter how small the patch is an absolute gift and that I am very lucky to have my shoes - no matter which pair I am referencing.

I honestly encourage anyone and everyone who can to participate in One Day Without Shoes. If you can only participate for only one hour that is wonderful or if your life allows you to participate for the whole 24 hours I encourage you go that route. Do what you can and challenge yourself in new ways.

Starting last year, TOMS placed a portion of their website which is dedicated to helping organize people in different cities to walk together and advocate for people without shoes - the list of events can be found via the Day Without Shoes website.

Think you might be the only one with a desire to go sans shoes? According to the TOMS website and the 2012 One Day Without Shoes trailer people from over 25 countries and over 1,000 events were planed worldwide to bring about awareness.

But what I learned most about my Day(s) Without Shoes is that there is always a different perspective. For Americans we have grown-up with shoes, we put them on and go into the world, go to work, school or the store. For a majority of children in development nations, they go into the world without shoes, many denied access to schooling because of no shoes - now that's a different perspective.

So what will you do on April 10 this year? An adventure sans shoes might be a step in the right direction towards understanding what it is like to be in someone else's shoes. 

Who is there to follow?

Lead by example, a philosophy taught to many generations - watch your elders, for they know your pains and can help you. These are traditions that run deep in a variety of cultures, but is slowing seeping out of American culture.

Earlier this month, I spent the weekend among friends. As most of them are in academia full time, we discussed the decreasing rate of new professor hires. One lady in the group has been turned down from positions which she is more than qualified for, so that universities can hire the Ph.D. professors that were let go because of the economic downturn. As a result, many smaller colleges and universities are hiring only people who have been teaching for a while with PhDs. 

A further example of this can be seen in age discrimination. I have heard several stories where applicants have had to die their hair in order to appear younger and therefore a valid candidate for a position, in which they are clearly the best choice - except for the age limitation put on by current day society or by the company to which they are applying. One particular individual has since let their hair return back to its natural color and has experienced discrimination at work because of age. But what is truly bizarre is the previously mentioned individual is frequently contacted by his boss, a man in his late 20s / early 30s to answer questions - because the young boss is not prepared for his position.

Here is my question - If companies only hire young, fresh out of school employees and over qualified individuals, who will leave the company as soon as something better opens up - who will lead the examples for employees trying to learn and expand their knowledge?

An interesting point was brought to my attention this past weekend, that humility is no longer frequently found today, I made an immediate link that this is because young employees lack a leader, a mentor and someone to listen when they admit they have a question or are in need of help.

If companies continue to hire to over qualified and the too young employees, the competitive culture found in business environments will manifest itself into our everyday culture. There will no longer be people to mentor young employees, but instead society will create an even more 'dog eat dog' world, which ultimately could lead to a larger gap between high class and lower class members.

We all just want change

After a month of taking off from writing for my blog, a decision which left me searching for my creative juices, I was talking to a friend of mine about what my next blog should be about. Jokingly, my very modest friend said, “me.” Which was quickly followed by my questioning if the true subject should be her desire to change the world. It is at this point that she pointed out that change is everyone’s goal.

I told that anecdote for a reason, which I hope will be relieved later. Earlier today, I came across a Huffington Post article, which stated Barbara Bush’s very blunt opinion of American politics. During her recent visit to Southern Methodist University, the Former First Lady Bush said: "I hate the fact that people think 'compromise' is a dirty word."

In many ways she is right and it is that simple. Politics today are as messy, hurtful and broken as they are because politicians are trying to see our very colorful world in black and white, wrong or right - and it’s just not that simple.

There is no absolute right or absolute wrong, but instead one  should vote for which candidate most fits the dream and the goals you see for America. Politics got complicated way too fast, it is no longer about making changing or creating change.

Instead it has evolved into being the change. Are we that egotistical of a society? That only one person can create change?  Margaret Mead once said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

I still believe, probably naively, that everyone person who get into politics does it in hopes of creating change, even if that means with the assistance of others. So at what point does it become - Only I can change the world.

Once politics regresses into “we can change the world,” then and only then can change truly come and that dreadful would “we” can only come with the use of the bad word “compromise.”

Faith in a time of protest

It seems to me that religion is not the right word for faith any more. I had an odd experience this weekend where I felt like the church service was attending was for lack of better words frowned upon by the traditionalists at the church I was attending.

So let me back up a bit, I am fortunate that I to go a church that is large enough it can offer a both contemporary services and various traditional services. In the very beginning, the contemporary service was held across the street and was seen more as a service project than a service recognized by the church. Eventually, the contemporary service moved into the smaller chapel on church grounds and took over the time slot once devoted to the children's service. Quickly outgrowing the small chapel, the one of the contemporary services was then placed down the hall in a room that used serve as the mass gathering place for health fairs, church wide meetings and the church program fair.

Sounds great right? I service that outgrows it's assigned home. That is so successful that the population of the church is growing? Wrong. As someone who is semi-involved in the church community, I cannot help but feel shunned by the 'traditional' church goers. Honestly, you would think that people would be excited that the church community is growing? That more 'young people' are attending; but sadly it does not appear that way.

Today, the contemporary service was delayed because our worship space was being used for the town hall meeting. A fellow usher informed me that he did not understand why the main chapel was not used for such meeting as it had more room. I shrugged and said the church probably wanted to allow for a transition between meetings and church services. And that's when it hit me, why is the collective contemporary service not standing up for itself. In an age of individualism and freedom, why are we constantly being treated like the step-child of our church.

So here's my question, is the religious affiliated 20 and 30-year-olds a group decreasing in its activity in the church? When asked a fair majority of individuals in this age rangs say they are spiritual, but not religious; they believe in God, but do not have a church home. Is this a phase or this age group finally looking for something more like our generation? Something they can relate to?

Feeling a bit like we could change the minds of those 'traditional' church goers, I was ready to stand up to any doubter when we first moved to our current location. I allowed people to just peak in and cut through on the way to their service; but now I just find the 'traditional' church goers are unwilling to change and open up. Unfortunately, I fell like the administration of the church is very similar, which is resulting is quite a deterrent. Resulting in two different sides being brought out within me - to either fight back and move on.

I think a lot of people are having the same debate and choosing to make a stance by moving on. The search to find your church, no matter why the change, can be long and challenging. However, I am wondering if in this age of protesting and expression, more people are not choosing to protest and stay at home. Choosing to find their faith and spirituality in other places. I know I find God when I meditating and running, neither of which are entirely possible or considered reverent for a church setting. There are many weeks where I find God in those places more than I do in Church. Is this a generational transition or a transition in a time of protest?

Is the greater congregation choosing to listening and question everything, leading to those who leave when they don't agree? It's about time to recognize that religion or the lack thereof is something you should connect with, not oblige yourself to attend.
  

Define journalism

This past week The New York Times' editor Arthur S. Brisbane asked his readers if truth was necessary in journalism. Let me sum up my response Mr. Brisbane: CBS and the Bush National Guard Story. Still not convinced? Stephen Glass of The New Republic.

Journalism at its most basic level is designed to keep an eye on society, politics and government to make certain that there is an unbiased view of every vote, situation and decision being presented to the American people. How are your readers supposed to believe in your company and in the news you are presenting them if they know it is fake, not research and just published? If they wanted news with no evidence or proof they would venture to the tabloid section of their grocery store. The New York Times, I believed, has better standards to uphold.

In Sept. 2008, the Wednesday edition of 60 Minutes, known as 60 Minutes II released a news story about President George W. Bush's time with the National Guard. Within hours of the story airing, the American public watched as one of the nation's major news companies was questioned in the most serious fashion.

George W. Bush was up for reelection and his military service history was coming to surface. CBS news received documentation that lead producers and news journalists to believe that Bush had defied direct orders from his superior while stationed in Texas with the National Guard. Additionally, other documents lead CBS to believe that one point Bush was in Alabama instead of serving time with the Texas National Guard. The days following the story airing, many of the sources CBS worked with in order to present a truthful story were suddenly changing their stories, some to the extreme of telling CBS executives and members of the unbiased committee formed to look at the story, that they never shared information about President Bush with members of the CBS 60 Minutes II teams.

Following the findings of the unbiased committee, which including members of the Associated Press, CBS asked four of the its executives to resign and the story producer was terminated. In November, Dan Rather announced that he was stepping down as anchor of 60 Minutes II. The organization under went suggestions from the unbiased committee that reviewed the story, leading to many changes within CBS in order to develop past this point in its history.

Another company that grew passed its once momental problems is the political magazine, The New Republic. Turned upside down by Stephen Glass, the magazine had one of its best writers caught red handed by Forbes Digital Tool for fabricating a story about a teenage computer server hacker, according to Vanity Fair.

Beginning with gracefully woven stories of truth and fiction, Glass found himself the "protege" of The New Republic, but with each new story Glass found a need to upstage himself. As his time at the political magazine continued he worked with three different editors, it was the last Charles Lane, known as "Chuck," who would finally place together all the pieces that lead to the discovery that Glass completely fabricated "Hack Heaven," a story about a teenage hacker who was being paid by a California company to not hack into their servers, according to Vanity Fair.

When Glass roped his younger brother into playing the part of one of his fabricated executives, Lane found himself with no choice but to fire Glass and publish an apology to the dedicated readers of The New Republic, notifying them that Glass had fabricated 27 of the 41 stories he had written for the paper, according to "Shattered Glass" and Vanity Fair. Hoping that the magazine would be able to continue functioning in the wake of lies.


All this Mr. Brisbane to say that the truth is the foundation of journalism. Report the truth, the hidden answers and the sought after stories - even if it might contribute to the collapse of your network; this action is simply the ethically right route to take.

Although I do not necessary agree with how these companies handled their situations, they owned up to the situations they discovered. They owned up to what could have potentially ruined their companies; I think you, the writers of The New York Times and journalists all over can do the American public the same courtesy of reporting the truth, really finding the truth on all aspects of American life, rather it is political races, government choices, protests or any other event. We, the readers and citizens of America deserve that much.